Arizona Cash Advance Reform, Proposition 200 (2008)

Arizona Cash Advance Reform, Proposition 200 (2008)


  • 1 Election results
  • 2 Text of this effort
  • 3 Back Ground
  • 4 information on the proposition
  • 5 Supporters
    • 5.1 Supporting arguments
    • 5.2 Donors to Proposition 200
  • 6 Opposition
    • 6.1 Opposing arguments
  • 7 Aftermath
  • 8 way to the ballot
    • 8.1 Ballot name lawsuit
  • 9 See also
  • 10 links that are external
    • 10.1 fundamental information
    • 10.2 Supporters
    • 10.3 Opponents
  • 11 Footnotes
Arizona Constitution
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 6.1 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 25 • 26 • 27 • 28 • 29 • 30

Arizona Proposition 200, also referred to as the cash advance Reform Act, ended up being in the November ballot in Arizona being a citizen-initiated amendment that is constitutional. It absolutely was beaten.

The payday-loan effort had been mainly supported by the payday-loan company into the continuing state, and ended up being less limiting compared to the avoid payday advances Initiative, sponsored by Rep. Marion McClure, D-30, and Sen. Debbie McCune Davis, D-14. That measure ended up being withdrawn at the beginning of June if not signatures that are enough being gathered to qualify it for the ballot. 1

Election results

Arizona Payday Loan Reform
Result Votes Percentage
d No 1,271,717 59.6%
Yes 860,607 40.4%

Text of this effort

The description that is 100-word with all the Arizona Secretary of State’s workplace with this initiated state statute checks out:

Arizonans use payday lending services each day to satisfy unexpected costs and emergencies that are financial. The payday financing industry is defined become eradicated additionally the Arizona Legislature does not want to enact reforms to profit borrowers while preserving this essential option that is financial. This measure brings dramatic reform that is pro-consumer payday lending and protect customer option. It offers a rate that is substantial, removes rolling-over major to extend that loan, produces a repayment plan free of charge to clients that can not satisfy their responsibilities, and inhibits a debtor’s capability to get multiple loan at any given time. 3 4


The payday financing industry ended up being an $85 billion industry that delivers short-term loans, that have been often guaranteed with a check postdated to your debtor’s next payday. The attention price into the lack of legislation had typically worked away to on average $15 per $100 lent on a loan that is two-week. The high interest levels had been exactly exactly just what had resulted in legislative tries to manage the industry. The training had been unlawful in fifteen states during the period of Proposition 200. In 2008, as well as Prop 200, Ohioans voted on payday financing in Ohio Issue 5. In Ohio and Arizona together, the true wide range of payday-lending branches outnumbers the Starbucks and McDonald’s outlets combined. 5

Information on the proposal

Under this proposition:

  • The payday-loan industry, which faces removal this season when an enabling law expires, will have its straight to exercise when you look at the state stretched indefinitely.
  • Costs payday loan providers are permitted to fee would drop from $17.65 to $15 for a $100, two-week loan.
  • Loan providers wouldn’t be allowed to move on the principal into extensive loans and will have to provide consumers payment plans.


“Arizonans for Financial Reform” was supporting this effort. It had been filed in reaction into the avoid payday advances Initiative, which will expel all pay day loans.

In line with the internet site of some other support that is affiliated, “Reform Arizona pay day loans,” 6 , a large number of Arizonans usage pay day loans responsibly to pay for unanticipated day-to-day costs. But, the website warns, the avoid pay day loans Initiative would eliminate this easy economic option in Arizona. Supporters with this measure argued that eliminating loans that are payday would harm numerous families economically, through higher banking fees, charge card belated costs, and energy reconnect charges. 6

Stan Barnes, a lobbyist and consultant to Americans for Financial Reform, a committee funded by the payday-loan industry, supported this measure and stated the presssing problem boils down to customer option.

“Payday-lending shops occur because clients into the real life make logical choices about borrowing cash short-term, as well as in numerous circumstances, pay day loans would be the most affordable choice for some people that have a crisis or unexpected cost they should cope with,” Barnes stated.

Supporters added that ending all pay day loans in Arizona would also eradicate a lot more than 2,500 Arizona jobs. 6

Supporting arguments

Main arguments submit to get Proposition 200 included:

  • Prop. 200 would mandate a cut that is substantial loan costs
  • Establishes a repayment plan that is flexible
  • Needs lenders that are internet be certified into the state
  • Enacts tough brand new laws to break down on unscrupulous operators
  • “About 5 per cent of People in america took down an online payday loan. There is scant evidence that their great deal will have been better if rejected that possibility. A report by two economists using the ny Federal Reserve Bank unearthed that after Georgia and new york abolished payday financing, bounced checks and Chapter 7 bankruptcies increased.” 7

Donors to Proposition 200

Because of the end of July, supporters of Prop. 200 had offered about $8.7 million up to a campaign committee arranged to advertise the initiative. The Arizona Republic stated that “nearly every cent. was donated by – guess who? – a trade team representing lenders that are payday the Arizona Community Financial solutions Association.” 8


The no that is website 200 : It really is No Reform after all had been created in opposition to the effort.

Rep. Marian McClure (R-Tucson), chairwoman associated with avoid Payday Loans Initiative campaign, stated that cash advance reform, like this cash advance Reform Act]], is nothing but “window dressing.” 9

The Party that is democratic of endorsed the avoid pay day loans effort and argued that payday advances are “by definition predatory and benefit from economically vulnerable Arizona families by trapping them in unending rounds of financial obligation.”

Opposing arguments

Main arguments proposed in opposition to Proposition 200 included:

  • Prop. 200 doesn’t lengthen the minimum loan term of five times, hence maintaining cash advance services and products at 391% APR or worse
  • Electronic use of debtor accounts offers payday lenders debit that is unfettered to consumer bank reports and facilitates overcharging
  • The repayment plan supply limits customers’ directly to request a payment want to when per 12 months.
  • “The argument that shutting loan that is payday will be a blow into the economy is similarly spurious. It could assist the economy whenever we legalized the purchase of heroin and allow merchants hawk it in the road, but it doesn’t suggest it might make our life any benefit. A business that thrives on keeping customers bad will not assist the economy.” 10


Pay check loan providers failed to disappear completely so effortlessly after the measure’s beat, them stay in business during the fall of 2009 as they tried to convince lawmakers to let. In accordance with reports, the industry hired previous state Attorney General Grant Woods to express them inside their efforts. Based on Woods, after learning a proposal because of the industry, he was convinced there is spot into the state of payday loan providers. 11

Way to the ballot

On 23, its supporters turned in more than 265,000 signatures to the Arizona Secretary of State june.

Ballot name lawsuit

Arizonans for Responsible Lending filed case within the ballot language. In line with the lawsuit, voters might unknowingly accept a limit of 400 % rates of interest for payday advances in the event that Secretary of State would not make clear the descriptive language of Proposition 200 from the November’s ballot.

Superior Court Judge Sam Myers ruled Aug. 27, 2008, that Secretary of State Janice Brewer would not have to simplify the language. Judge Myers stated that the description associated with the ballot measure drafted by Secretary Brewer ended up being theoretically accurate, and therefore with just 50 words to spell out issues that are complex alternatives need to be made.

نوشتن نظر

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *